Æsthe/tech:Tonik

Building | Beauty | Consuming | Image

Building Almaty: Republic Square Competition

 

almaty-gravity.jpg

Recently there has been an extreme interest in place-making for a remote corner of the world in Kazakhstan (as documented here). Almaty, once the capital of Kazakhstan, still remains its financial and cultural hub. A number of international competitions have recently been sponsored to develop a new financial and cultural district in the southeastern part of the city. Among these, one competition in particular was to design a new mixed use development (consisting of high end residences, a luxury hotel, office and retail spaces) adjacent to the most significant civic space in the city, Republic Square. Remnants of Soviet occupation still reverberate through the city, and the undercurrent for this (and all) of the competitions seems be revealing an image of the city and culture that has always been there, but never focused.

The question is how to do this in light of embracing some of the progressive measures found in western architecture, but keeping a strong tie to a cultural situation as the city moves forward with this vision.

Jury members for the competition were Hani Rashid, Michael Sorkin, Suha Ozkan, and Mohsen Mostafavi.

The competition participants were Eric Owen Moss Architects, Eisenman Architects, Zaha Hadid Architects, and a team of E/Ye Design & NBBJ. The following were the entries, minus the Eisenman scheme, which I can’t find images of. The Hadid and EOM schemes were recently exhibited at SCI-Arc in February. Blurbs can be found on the school’s website.

The E/Ye Design + NBBJ scheme specifically deals with the relationship of the built and the landscape, and exploits the spaces left between as a direct outcropping of the dichotomies created by a true “mixed use” program. Check out the images – commentary welcome…

eom-scheme.jpg

Eric Owen Moss, Architects

zaha-scheme.jpg

Zaha Hadid Architects

nbbj-scheme-01.jpg

nbbj-scheme-02.jpg

Greyscape

NBBJ + E/Ye Design

Model

MS

4 Comments»

  Chicago Rent Deposit wrote @

These buildings are starting to look cool, but are they really the most efficient use of space? The Smurfs HAD to live in mushrooms. Why should we?

  mvsuriano wrote @

Thanks for the comment. The client’s goal in this project was not the effiency of the space, but actually the affectual nature of the spaces afforded by its unique intersection of form and material. People will debate whether or not a building’s purpose goes beyond function and efficiency. Our philosophy is that it does, so this project reflects that.

In terms of the smurfs, it is really funny you should say that.

I wish we could be so smart as the smurfs. A traditional gabled roof house actally has the same section as a smurf house/mushroom, except that a mushroom is circular in plan and therefore more efficient in terms of surface area. Its materials are entirely biodegradable (obviously), it can populate itself at an alarming rate, in a number of ecologic conditions, and it is self structured.

If we are lucky – we may see this type of sophistication in a built structure in our lifetime…

  Thesaurus dictionary wrote @

Excuse me, but I don’t think that it will look great in Almaty. It’s a big historical center and these hi-tech buildings I think won’t look organic.

  synonyms online wrote @

As for me it’s not a big historical center, so I’m sure such buildings won’t make anything bad in architect sense!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 146 other followers