<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Almaty: Republic Square Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aesthetechtonik.com/2007/04/16/building-almaty-republic-square-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aesthetechtonik.com/2007/04/16/building-almaty-republic-square-competition/</link>
	<description>Building &#124; Beauty &#124; Consuming &#124; Image</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:48:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: synonyms online</title>
		<link>http://aesthetechtonik.com/2007/04/16/building-almaty-republic-square-competition/#comment-7301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[synonyms online]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aesthetechtonik.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/building-almaty-republic-square-competition/#comment-7301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As for me it&#039;s not a big historical center, so I&#039;m sure such buildings won&#039;t make anything bad in architect sense!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for me it&#8217;s not a big historical center, so I&#8217;m sure such buildings won&#8217;t make anything bad in architect sense!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thesaurus dictionary</title>
		<link>http://aesthetechtonik.com/2007/04/16/building-almaty-republic-square-competition/#comment-7221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thesaurus dictionary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aesthetechtonik.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/building-almaty-republic-square-competition/#comment-7221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excuse me, but I don&#039;t think that it will look great in Almaty. It&#039;s a big historical center and these hi-tech buildings I  think won&#039;t look organic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me, but I don&#8217;t think that it will look great in Almaty. It&#8217;s a big historical center and these hi-tech buildings I  think won&#8217;t look organic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mvsuriano</title>
		<link>http://aesthetechtonik.com/2007/04/16/building-almaty-republic-square-competition/#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mvsuriano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aesthetechtonik.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/building-almaty-republic-square-competition/#comment-1311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment. The client&#039;s goal in this project was not the effiency of the space, but actually the affectual nature of the spaces afforded by its unique intersection of form and material. People will debate whether or not  a building&#039;s purpose goes beyond function and efficiency. Our philosophy is that it does, so this project reflects that.

In terms of the smurfs, it is really funny you should say that. 

I wish we could be so smart as the smurfs. A traditional gabled roof house actally has the same section as a smurf house/mushroom, except that a mushroom is circular in plan and therefore more efficient in terms of surface area. Its materials are entirely biodegradable (obviously), it can populate itself at an alarming rate, in a number of ecologic conditions, and it is self structured.

If we are lucky - we may see this type of sophistication in a built structure in our lifetime...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment. The client&#8217;s goal in this project was not the effiency of the space, but actually the affectual nature of the spaces afforded by its unique intersection of form and material. People will debate whether or not  a building&#8217;s purpose goes beyond function and efficiency. Our philosophy is that it does, so this project reflects that.</p>
<p>In terms of the smurfs, it is really funny you should say that. </p>
<p>I wish we could be so smart as the smurfs. A traditional gabled roof house actally has the same section as a smurf house/mushroom, except that a mushroom is circular in plan and therefore more efficient in terms of surface area. Its materials are entirely biodegradable (obviously), it can populate itself at an alarming rate, in a number of ecologic conditions, and it is self structured.</p>
<p>If we are lucky &#8211; we may see this type of sophistication in a built structure in our lifetime&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicago Rent Deposit</title>
		<link>http://aesthetechtonik.com/2007/04/16/building-almaty-republic-square-competition/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chicago Rent Deposit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aesthetechtonik.wordpress.com/2007/04/16/building-almaty-republic-square-competition/#comment-1297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These buildings are starting to look cool, but are they really the most efficient use of space?  The Smurfs HAD to live in mushrooms.  Why should we?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These buildings are starting to look cool, but are they really the most efficient use of space?  The Smurfs HAD to live in mushrooms.  Why should we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

