Comments on: Concept Pipeline http://aesthetechtonik.com Building | Beauty | Consuming | Image Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:57:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: mvsuriano http://aesthetechtonik.com/concept-pipeline/#comment-2029 Sat, 10 May 2008 13:39:58 +0000 http://aesthetechtonik.wordpress.com/concept-pipeline/#comment-2029 Thanks for the comment – I would agree, the latter phases of the pipeline are not convergent, which was purposeful.

This was more an exercise to identify where these pieces of contemporary architectural thinking (reorganization, technique, affect) fall in the sequence of conceptualization as a synthetic organism, rather than being simply autonomous.

This is also my view, and one maybe not held by others.

]]> By: wenfa ng http://aesthetechtonik.com/concept-pipeline/#comment-2028 Sat, 10 May 2008 12:01:25 +0000 http://aesthetechtonik.wordpress.com/concept-pipeline/#comment-2028 NIce graphics and nice caveats on generalisation, as it seems to be just that. if we are applying system thinking approach to these broad ideas, it can possibly provide the unifying point.
getting on the band wagon of system thinking we can then introduce the notion of equilibrium and driver to ‘activate’ the engine as well as to rationalise the value of the different components ‘of the sub categories’. each components can then as a sub-systems be further pursuit to its end. everything else that is said in the article are loose compilation of on going ideas without a clear point of convergence or originality. perhaps that is the aim, perhaps not. but the graphic is so cool cheers to that.
cheers

]]>