<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manifest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aesthetechtonik.com/manifest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aesthetechtonik.com</link>
	<description>Building &#124; Beauty &#124; Consuming &#124; Image</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:48:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://aesthetechtonik.com/manifest/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand where you are coming from. I always thought that over-intellectualize about architecture is not only unhealthy but boring as hell. 

The architecture I understand from the Pyramid to Acropolis to Gothic to Renaissance.... to Gehry is dealing with, in the context of aesthetic, is representational, or symbolic in some sense. That means form is not just form, but have meaning attached to it. 

Technology seems to be the differentiating factor of what can be constructed. But just becuase we can do something doesn&#039;t mean that we should. Just because we can draw circle doesn&#039;t mean that every building should be circular. Technology has to be able to find a match in meaning that is relevant in our time and situation. 

As the world is flattening and everything is more interconnected than ever, the key is how aesthetics persue is integrated with everything else so that it communicates and therefore impacts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand where you are coming from. I always thought that over-intellectualize about architecture is not only unhealthy but boring as hell. </p>
<p>The architecture I understand from the Pyramid to Acropolis to Gothic to Renaissance&#8230;. to Gehry is dealing with, in the context of aesthetic, is representational, or symbolic in some sense. That means form is not just form, but have meaning attached to it. </p>
<p>Technology seems to be the differentiating factor of what can be constructed. But just becuase we can do something doesn&#8217;t mean that we should. Just because we can draw circle doesn&#8217;t mean that every building should be circular. Technology has to be able to find a match in meaning that is relevant in our time and situation. </p>
<p>As the world is flattening and everything is more interconnected than ever, the key is how aesthetics persue is integrated with everything else so that it communicates and therefore impacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

